Freedom of expression is an imperative part of the American Bill of Rights. The class was provided with the Eight Values of Free Expression, from which the last stood out to me the most. It is titled “Protect Dissent”. The idea comes from Steven Shiffrin’s book, Dissent, Injustice and the Meanings of America. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691070230/dissent-injustice-and-the-meanings-of-america In this overview, readers can learn that Shiffrin believes dissent is at the heart of the core of freedom of speech. He emphasizes his belief that not only is disagreement with the government a protected act, but it is also our patriotic duty to criticize the government. This is to protect the country from mob rule and tyranny.
A reason this particular value stood out to me was that during my senior year of high school I took A.P. Gov. In this class one of the most emphasized themes was that of “mob rule”. My class was taught so many different instances where the founding fathers created assurances for mob rule to not acquire power. To see how my last government class carries over to this one is very interesting! Another reason I chose this value was because I also am very strong in my belief of access to equality. I believe all voices need the right and protection of said right to be heard. Shiffrin emphasizes the importance of minority voices being heard, which stuck with me.The Bill of Rights’ purpose is to protect the citizens, and assuring minority voices and opinions can not be silenced is a fantastic way to promote this.
The importance of freedom of speech is not only exemplified through the protection of minorities in America. This idea has been dated back to Ancient Greek philosophies. Our amendment states that people are free to express any opinion without fear of government censorship, in all communication including speeches, art and social media. https://www.history.com/topics/united-states-constitution/freedom-of-speech This means anyone is free to express even nasty and negative opinions. One big conversation being had recently is that of whether the government is not granting citizens these rights on social media.
Social media has been restricting certain users and posts due to political differences. Posts will be labeled as “not credible” and get restricted. Very prominent users of certain platforms will get banned for “promoting hate” or not following “ community guidelines”. America’s 45th President was banned from Twitter for expressing his opinions. This man has millions of supporters and was president, yet his words can be silenced. What does this say for those with even less political power? Does the government now get to pick and choose whose voices get to be heard?
From my studies, I have personally found freedom of speech to be critical in the functionality of the United States government. I strongly agree with Shiffrin’s opinions on the need for dissent to protect our government. Without challenging and disagreeing with the government, the same politicians will be completely ruling over the country, defeating the entire purpose of our democracy. Losing the voices of the people is the exact opposite of what the founding fathers set our country up for. If our Bill of Rights defends the thoughts and expression of said thoughts for the people, the right must not be violated.
https://fys1000.blogspot.com/p/speech-theories.html
No comments:
Post a Comment